Informations sur l'album Genius Casebook: Con Law de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Samedi 23 Novembre 2024 est sorti le nouvel album de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appelé Genius Casebook: Con Law.
L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- Romer v. Evans
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Korematsu v. United States
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Maine v. Taylor
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Civil Rights Cases
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Cooper v. Aaron
- United States v. Morrison
- Honig v. Doe
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Reno v. Condon
- Bush v. Gore
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- United States v. Lopez
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Brown v. Board of Education
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Alden v. Maine
- Loving v. Virginia
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- Printz v. United States
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Marbury v. Madison
- Powell v. McCormack
- Ex Parte Milligan
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Nixon v. United States
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Baker v. Carr
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Shelby County v. Holder
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- Stafford v. Wallace
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- Clinton v. Jones
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- United States v. Windsor
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Ex Parte McCardle
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- INS v. Chadha
- Ex Parte Young
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Roe v. Wade
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Wickard v. Filburn
- United States v. Virginia
- Champion v. Ames
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- Washington v. Davis
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- New York v. United States
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Rasul v. Bush
- United States v. Darby
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Texas v. Johnson
- Morrison v. Olson
- Miller v. California
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- City of Boerne v. Flores
